<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Science Delusion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://martien.aardrock.com/2007/09/05/the-science-delusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://martien.aardrock.com/2007/09/05/the-science-delusion/</link>
	<description>At Home in the Universe</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gerald de Jong</title>
		<link>http://martien.aardrock.com/2007/09/05/the-science-delusion/#comment-2508</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald de Jong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martien.aardrock.com/2007/09/05/the-science-delusion/#comment-2508</guid>
		<description>I find Chopra's rebuttal really weak.  Like, how silly is a statement like this: "Dawkins sweeps aside some of the greatest minds in history who took God seriously (Plato, Socrates, Hegel, Kant, Aquinas, Newton) because they haven’t kept up with the latest issue of Scientific American, as he has."

Chopra should take a serious look at Dawkins' assertion that religion makes scientific statements, and therefore deserves scientifically rigorous analysis.

Fortunately, your link to Chopra is broken because it wasn't terminated correctly: "htmlThe".  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find Chopra&#8217;s rebuttal really weak.  Like, how silly is a statement like this: &#8220;Dawkins sweeps aside some of the greatest minds in history who took God seriously (Plato, Socrates, Hegel, Kant, Aquinas, Newton) because they haven’t kept up with the latest issue of Scientific American, as he has.&#8221;</p>
<p>Chopra should take a serious look at Dawkins&#8217; assertion that religion makes scientific statements, and therefore deserves scientifically rigorous analysis.</p>
<p>Fortunately, your link to Chopra is broken because it wasn&#8217;t terminated correctly: &#8220;htmlThe&#8221;.  <img src='http://martien.aardrock.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
